From: Frank <frannk_m1@yahoo.com>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: 2.4.x vs 2.6.x performance
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:24:13 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060123042413.806.qmail@web32201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
I remember reading a while back that the 2.6 kernel is
considerably slower then the 2.4 kernel (Wolfgang Denx). Has
anybody taken any performance measurements on a later kernel
version to see if the above still hods true?
I'm thinking about moving to 2.6 since a lot of open source
projects have stopped suporting the 2.4 kernel.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
next reply other threads:[~2006-01-23 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-23 4:24 Frank [this message]
2006-01-25 15:45 ` 2.4.x vs 2.6.x performance Dan Malek
2006-01-25 15:55 ` Frank
2006-01-25 18:41 ` Otto Solares
2006-01-25 20:14 ` Carlos Munoz
2006-01-25 23:46 ` Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060123042413.806.qmail@web32201.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=frannk_m1@yahoo.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.