From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750790AbWAXWdo (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:33:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750791AbWAXWdo (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:33:44 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:48283 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750790AbWAXWdn (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:33:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:33:28 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Dave Jones , Andrew Morton , rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] swsusp: userland interface (rev 2) Message-ID: <20060124223328.GC1602@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200601240929.37676.rjw@sisk.pl> <20060124131312.0545262d.akpm@osdl.org> <20060124213010.GA1602@elf.ucw.cz> <20060124135843.739481e7.akpm@osdl.org> <20060124221426.GB1602@elf.ucw.cz> <20060124222044.GG2449@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20060124222044.GG2449@redhat.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Út 24-01-06 17:20:44, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:14:26PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > suspending programs are quite closely tied to the kernel. I think it > > is reasonable to expect users to have matching version of kernel and > > userland-swsusp tools > > _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > / \ / \ | _ \| _ \ / ___|/ ___| | | | | | | | | | | | | > / _ \ / _ \ | |_) | |_) | | _| | _| |_| | |_| | |_| | |_| | > / ___ \ / ___ \| _ <| _ <| |_| | |_| | _ | _ | _ | _ | > /_/ \_\/_/ \_\_| \_\_| \_\\____|\____|_| |_|_| |_|_| |_|_| |_| > > Someone please stop this madness.. Nice ascii art :-). We'll of course try to get the interface right at the first try. OTOH... if wrong interface is in kernel for a month, I do not think it is reasonable to keep supporting that wrong interface for a year before it can be removed. One month of warning should be fair in such case... Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp!