From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:00:21 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] PRIO on non-leaf classes?
Message-Id: <20060125150021.GB10755@EIS>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <43D77CEE.8000001@obs.bg>
In-Reply-To: <43D77CEE.8000001@obs.bg>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 03:28:14PM +0200, openswan wrote:
> I'm using HTB and would like to ask is it correct to put "PRIO" on
> non-leaf classes ? I know that on leaf classes it's correct and
> determines how the excess bandwidth is distributed among non-leaf classes.

Depends on what you mean by "PRIO". If you're talking about the 
class parameter prio (in lower-case letters), then it's correct, 
the PRIO QDisc however, can not be attached to anything but the 
device itself (root qdisc) or a leaf class.

Regards
Andreas Klauer
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc