All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: steiner@sgi.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rml@novell.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.16 - sys_sched_getaffinity & hotplug
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:23:56 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060128052355.GC18730@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060127205834.b5821a02.pj@sgi.com>

Paul Jackson wrote:
> Nathan wrote:
> > Which is problematic, because cpuset_cpus_allowed ->
> > guarantee_online_cpus restricts the task->cpus_allowed mask to cpus
> > which happen to be online at the time of the call to
> > sched_setaffinity.  If more cpus come online later, that task can't be
> > migrated to them.
> 
> Well, sort of.
> 
> A task could always migrate - just because a sched_getaffinity
> the task did in the past doesn't show a CPU as valid, doesn't stop
> the task from asking to pin to that CPU now.

I was speaking of the setaffinity (not getaffinity) case -- I assumed
this was what you were referring to since I couldn't find any calls to
the cpuset code in the getaffinity path.


> One of three lessons could be taken from your example:
>  1) return all possible CPUS (CPU_MASK_ALL, likely), as you
> recommend

I'm only recommending not changing the current behavior of
sched_getaffinity.

(BTW - cpu_possible_map can be a subset of CPU_MASK_ALL on some
platforms -- powerpc, at least, since we can discover the number of
truly possible cpus early in boot.)


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-28  5:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-27 23:06 2.6.16 - sys_sched_getaffinity & hotplug Jack Steiner
2006-01-28  2:58 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-01-29 13:06   ` Jack Steiner
2006-01-28  3:14 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28  3:42   ` Nathan Lynch
2006-01-28  4:58     ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28  5:23       ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2006-01-28  6:40         ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28  7:04         ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 13:32   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-28 16:08     ` Jack Steiner
2006-01-28 19:27     ` Nathan Lynch
2006-01-28 20:06       ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-29 13:51         ` [PATCH] " Jack Steiner
2006-01-28 20:09     ` 2.6.16 " Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 20:50       ` Robert Love
2006-01-28 21:00         ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-29 13:01         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-29 16:09           ` Robert Love
2006-01-29 17:26             ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060128052355.GC18730@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=ntl@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=rml@novell.com \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.