From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH 001/003]Fix unify mapping from pxm to node id. Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 21:04:12 -0800 Message-ID: <20060128210412.0c050675.pj@sgi.com> References: <20060123165644.C147.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20060126074846.1a6dd300.pj@sgi.com> <20060128122758.CF50.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20060127231517.4c0ce573.pj@sgi.com> <20060129034434.GO7306@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060129034434.GO7306@localhost> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Cc: y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com, akpm@osdl.org, apw@shadowen.org, bob.picco@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, ak@suse.de, len.brown@intel.com, discuss@x86-64.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Bob wrote: > MAX_PXM_DOMAINS is defined in include/acpi/acpi_numa.h. So I'm confused. Ah - there it is. My mistake. I did not realize that the list set of 3 patches was in addition to, rather than replacing the previous patches. I am retesting my build now -- I should be able to report success in a few hours. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Jackson Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:04:12 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 001/003]Fix unify mapping from pxm to node id. Message-Id: <20060128210412.0c050675.pj@sgi.com> List-Id: References: <20060123165644.C147.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20060126074846.1a6dd300.pj@sgi.com> <20060128122758.CF50.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20060127231517.4c0ce573.pj@sgi.com> <20060129034434.GO7306@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060129034434.GO7306@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com, akpm@osdl.org, apw@shadowen.org, bob.picco@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, ak@suse.de, len.brown@intel.com, discuss@x86-64.org Bob wrote: > MAX_PXM_DOMAINS is defined in include/acpi/acpi_numa.h. So I'm confused. Ah - there it is. My mistake. I did not realize that the list set of 3 patches was in addition to, rather than replacing the previous patches. I am retesting my build now -- I should be able to report success in a few hours. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750829AbWA2FEp (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:04:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750828AbWA2FEp (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:04:45 -0500 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:49618 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750829AbWA2FEn (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:04:43 -0500 Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 21:04:12 -0800 From: Paul Jackson To: "Bob Picco" Cc: y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com, akpm@osdl.org, apw@shadowen.org, bob.picco@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, ak@suse.de, len.brown@intel.com, discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 001/003]Fix unify mapping from pxm to node id. Message-Id: <20060128210412.0c050675.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20060129034434.GO7306@localhost> References: <20060123165644.C147.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20060126074846.1a6dd300.pj@sgi.com> <20060128122758.CF50.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20060127231517.4c0ce573.pj@sgi.com> <20060129034434.GO7306@localhost> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.7 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bob wrote: > MAX_PXM_DOMAINS is defined in include/acpi/acpi_numa.h. So I'm confused. Ah - there it is. My mistake. I did not realize that the list set of 3 patches was in addition to, rather than replacing the previous patches. I am retesting my build now -- I should be able to report success in a few hours. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401