From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k0TDXSXf024232 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 08:33:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from web51510.mail.yahoo.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k0TDWEQA010630 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:32:14 GMT Message-ID: <20060129133318.64917.qmail@web51510.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:33:18 -0800 (PST) From: Steve G Subject: Re: labeling of compilers etc To: russell@coker.com.au, SELinux List In-Reply-To: <200601291156.13076.russell@coker.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov >If it's considered worth-while then I'm willing to write a policy patch for >the first one and a bash patch for the second one. A setuid shell script is an extremely bad idea. I think bash refuses to run them. Is it really necessary to add a SE Linux patch to bash when it already refuses to do this? -Steve __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.