From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dmytro O. Redchuk" Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:28:30 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] u32 match versus iptables CLASSIFY target - performance Message-Id: <20060130122830.GC9242@ldc.net> List-Id: References: <33308.82.76.57.78.1138623302.squirrel@mail.orion.ro> In-Reply-To: <33308.82.76.57.78.1138623302.squirrel@mail.orion.ro> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:15:02PM +0200, Cristian Carstea wrote: > hello, > > i have a question: > - which one is faster: "tc filter with u32 match per dst ip" or "iptables > match per dst ip with target CLASSIFY"? > - this question is for large rulesets (over 500) use hashes if it's possible to hash those "ip dst". > > thank you, > cristian carstea -- _,-=._ /|_/| `-.} `=._,.-=-._., @ @._, `._ _,-. ) _,.-' ` G.m-"^m`m' Dmytro O. Redchuk _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc