All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:24:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060131212432.GA18812@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060131102758.GA31460@gondor.apana.org.au>


* Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:

> This inference is where the validator errs.  sk_dst_lock is never (or 
> should never be, and as far as I can see none of the traces show it to 
> do so) obtained in a real softirq context.

just to make sure - is the trace below a safe use of sk_dst_lock too?  
Here sk_dst_lock seems to be taken in real softirq context.

	Ingo

============================
[ BUG: illegal lock usage! ]
----------------------------
illegal {softirq-on} -> {in-softirq} usage.
sshd/2476 [HC0[0]:SC1[2]:HE1:SE0] takes:
 (&sk->sk_dst_lock){-+}, at: [<c0499015>] inet6_destroy_sock+0x25/0x100
{softirq-on} state was registered at:
 [<c04a1bd8>] ipv6_dev_get_saddr+0x138/0x640
hardirqs last enabled at: [<c04dea45>] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x25/0x30
softirqs last enabled at: [<c01231e5>] irq_exit+0x45/0x50

other info that might help us debug this:
3 locks held by sshd/2476:
 #0:  (&p->proc_lock){--}, at: [<c011f1a3>] release_task+0x23/0x150
 #1:  (&tp->rx_lock){-+}, at: [<c0342a15>] rtl8139_poll+0x45/0x4c0
 #2:  (&sk->sk_lock.slock/1){-+}, at: [<c047e8f6>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x726/0x9d0

stack backtrace:
 [<c010437d>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
 [<c0104397>] dump_stack+0x17/0x20
 [<c0139538>] print_usage_bug+0x1d8/0x230
 [<c01398a8>] mark_lock+0x318/0x350
 [<c0139d73>] debug_lock_chain+0x493/0x1090
 [<c013a9ad>] debug_lock_chain_spin+0x3d/0x60
 [<c0269272>] _raw_write_lock+0x32/0x1a0
 [<c04de9e8>] _write_lock+0x8/0x10
 [<c0499015>] inet6_destroy_sock+0x25/0x100
 [<c04b8672>] tcp_v6_destroy_sock+0x12/0x20
 [<c046bbda>] inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x4a/0x150
 [<c047625c>] tcp_rcv_state_process+0xd4c/0xdd0
 [<c047d8e9>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xa9/0x340
 [<c047eabb>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x8eb/0x9d0
 [<c0462c76>] ip_local_deliver+0xa6/0x190
 [<c04629f8>] ip_rcv+0x2f8/0x4d0
 [<c044bcb6>] netif_receive_skb+0x1b6/0x2a0
 [<c0342d3a>] rtl8139_poll+0x36a/0x4c0
 [<c044a682>] net_rx_action+0xd2/0x1f0
 [<c0123527>] __do_softirq+0x97/0x130
 [<c01054d9>] do_softirq+0x69/0x100
 =======================
 [<c01231e5>] irq_exit+0x45/0x50
 [<c01055c4>] do_IRQ+0x54/0x70
 [<c01038a9>] common_interrupt+0x25/0x2c
 [<c0120990>] do_wait+0x7d0/0xad0
 [<c0120cc2>] sys_wait4+0x32/0x40
 [<c0120cf5>] sys_waitpid+0x25/0x30
 [<c0102e17>] sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x8d

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-31 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-27  0:18 [lock validator] net/ipv4/fib_hash.c: illegal {enabled-softirqs} -> {used-in-softirq} usage? Ingo Molnar
2006-01-27  1:41 ` Herbert Xu
2006-01-28 15:22   ` [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency Ingo Molnar
2006-01-28 15:44     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-31 10:27     ` Herbert Xu
2006-01-31 10:43       ` David S. Miller
2006-01-31 11:21         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-01 13:32         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-01 20:26           ` Herbert Xu
2006-02-02  7:46             ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-02  8:48               ` Herbert Xu
2006-02-02  9:04                 ` David S. Miller
2006-02-02 10:54                 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-02 11:27                   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-02 12:19                     ` Herbert Xu
2006-02-02 12:17                   ` Herbert Xu
2006-02-02 13:54                     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-31 21:24       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-01-31 22:06         ` Herbert Xu
2006-02-01 10:42         ` Herbert Xu
2006-02-01 11:13           ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-03  1:01           ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060131212432.GA18812@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.