From: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org, "Jenkins, Clive" <Clive.Jenkins@xerox.com>
Subject: Re: Yosemite/440EP why are readl()/ioread32() setup to readlittle-endian?
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 20:07:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060201200721.E16064@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0602011851490.22854-100000@gate.crashing.org>; from galak@kernel.crashing.org on Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:54:09PM -0600
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:54:09PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>
> > >>>>> "Matt" == Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
> >
> > Matt> read*/write* and ioread*/iowrite* generate outbound little
> > Matt> endian cycles on ALL arches, period. They are intended
> > Matt> only for PCI use and have generic names only because of
> > Matt> the assumption that "all the world is a PC".
> >
> > What is the preferred way of accessing non-PCI devices then? Direct
> > pointer access?
>
> No direct pointer access is bad. On PPC You can use
> in_be{8,16,32}/out_be{8,16,32}
Ack. Also, it should be pointed out that there are countless
examples of PPC drivers where this is done properly. 4xx, 83xx,
85xx, etc. on-chip peripherals all do this since they are
naturally BE registers.
-Matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-02 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-01 11:19 Yosemite/440EP why are readl()/ioread32() setup to readlittle-endian? Jenkins, Clive
2006-02-01 17:02 ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 17:44 ` Matt Porter
2006-02-01 17:53 ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 18:04 ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 18:11 ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-01 18:20 ` David Hawkins
2006-02-01 18:23 ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-01 21:14 ` Peter Korsgaard
2006-02-02 0:54 ` Kumar Gala
2006-02-02 3:07 ` Matt Porter [this message]
2006-02-02 8:09 ` Peter Korsgaard
2006-02-02 9:08 ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-02 17:34 ` Dale Farnsworth
2006-02-02 14:21 ` Matt Porter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-01 18:35 Jenkins, Clive
2006-02-01 20:35 ` David Hawkins
2006-02-02 9:35 Jenkins, Clive
2006-02-02 9:46 ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-02 14:37 ` Matt Porter
2006-02-02 17:45 ` Eugene Surovegin
2006-02-02 18:16 ` Matt Porter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060201200721.E16064@cox.net \
--to=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=Clive.Jenkins@xerox.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.