diff for duplicates of <20060201220903.GE16471@esmail.cup.hp.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index dd3f946..fa4a3aa 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ that up and I'm pretty sure Tony Luck, Paul Mckerras and a few others would object unless you can give a better reason. Obviously neither memory footprint nor speed of walking memory is an -the issue for 32-bit arches (where unsigned long = unsigned int). +the issue for 32-bit arches (where unsigned long == unsigned int). > > unsigned long is typically the native register size, right? diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index d96a758..3888ba7 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ "ref\0200602012141.k11LfCg32497@unix-os.sc.intel.com\0" "From\0Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/12] generic *_bit()\0" - "Date\0Wed, 01 Feb 2006 22:09:03 +0000\0" + "Date\0Wed, 1 Feb 2006 14:09:03 -0800\0" "To\0Chen" " Kenneth W <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>\0" "Cc\0'Grant Grundler' <iod00d@hp.com>" @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ "others would object unless you can give a better reason.\n" "\n" "Obviously neither memory footprint nor speed of walking memory is an\n" - "the issue for 32-bit arches (where unsigned long = unsigned int).\n" + "the issue for 32-bit arches (where unsigned long == unsigned int).\n" "\n" "\n" "> > unsigned long is typically the native register size, right?\n" @@ -57,4 +57,4 @@ "\n" grant -d39a6ed5865e485cb3afe4bcd8a8f9a74af216e1a6aa2ddb0a70127b14d56568 +7a24c4e392a68b7b340ea13cbded0e5566a9b37232dd7328c692cdfb4a928d5e
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.