From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:19:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mipsfw.mips-uk.com ([194.74.144.146]:21003 "EHLO bacchus.net.dhis.org") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S3465649AbWBBRTL (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:19:11 +0000 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by bacchus.net.dhis.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k12HOYSY021790; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:24:34 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k12HOYru021789; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:24:34 GMT Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:24:34 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: macro@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] TX49 MFC0 bug workaround Message-ID: <20060202172434.GE17352@linux-mips.org> References: <20060203.013401.41198517.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20060202165656.GC17352@linux-mips.org> <20060203.020428.59032357.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060203.020428.59032357.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 10313 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:04:28AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > Is this preferred? We can get rid of all TX49XX_MFC0_WAR on this way. It should be ok for any R4000-style status register. I'm not sure about R3000 - but I'm sure Maciej will know. If he agrees I'd say let's go for it. Ralf