From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: clameter@engr.sgi.com, steiner@sgi.com, dgc@sgi.com,
Simon.Derr@bull.net, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] cpuset memory spread page cache implementation and hooks
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:51:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060205215152.27800776.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060204221524.1607401e.akpm@osdl.org>
Earlier Andrew wrote:
> Really has two forms, depending upon Kconfig.
>
> 1:
>
> static inline struct page *page_cache_alloc(struct address_space *x)
> {
> return alloc_pages(mapping_gfp_mask(x), 0);
> }
>
> That should be inlined.
>
> 2:
>
> static inline struct page *page_cache_alloc(struct address_space *x)
> {
> if (cpuset_mem_spread_check()) {
> int n = cpuset_mem_spread_node();
> return alloc_pages_node(n, mapping_gfp_mask(x), 0);
> }
> return alloc_pages(mapping_gfp_mask(x), 0);
> }
Later on, he wrote:
> I'm saying "gee, that looks big. Do you have time to investigate possible
> improvements?" They may come to naught.
After playing around with the variations we've considered on this
thread, the results are simple enough. I experimented with just
the 3 calls to page_cache_alloc_cold() in mm/filemap.c, because that
was easy, and all these calls have the same shape.
For non-NUMA, removing 'inline' from the three page_cache_alloc_cold()
calls in mm/filemap.c would cost a total of 16 bytes text size
For NUMA+CPUSET, removing it would _save_ 583 bytes total over the
three calls.
The "nm -S" size of the uninlined page_cache_alloc_cold() is 448 bytes
(it was 96 bytes before this cpuset patchset).
This is all on ia64 sn2_defconfig gcc 3.3.3.
The conclusion is straight forward, and as Andrew suspected.
We want these two page_cache_alloc*() routines out of line in the
NUMA case, but left inline for the non-NUMA case.
I will follow up with a simple patch that makes it easy to mark
routines that should be inline for UMA, out of line for NUMA.
These two page_cache_alloc*(), and perhaps also __cache_alloc() when
Pekka or I gets a handle on it, are candidates for this marking, as
routines to inline on UMA, out of line on NUMA.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-06 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-04 7:19 [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation Paul Jackson
2006-02-04 7:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] cpuset memory spread page cache implementation and hooks Paul Jackson
2006-02-04 23:49 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 1:42 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-05 1:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 3:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-05 5:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 6:08 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-05 6:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 6:28 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 0:20 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 5:51 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2006-02-06 7:14 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-02-06 7:42 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-02-06 7:51 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-02-06 17:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-04 7:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] cpuset memory spread slab cache implementation Paul Jackson
2006-02-04 23:49 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 3:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-04 7:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] cpuset memory spread slab cache optimizations Paul Jackson
2006-02-04 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 3:18 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-04 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 4:10 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-04 7:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] cpuset memory spread slab cache hooks Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-04 23:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 3:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 4:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 5:50 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 6:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 6:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 7:22 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 8:19 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 8:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 9:03 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 9:27 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 20:22 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 8:47 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 9:09 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 10:09 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 10:16 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 10:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 10:35 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 14:42 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 14:35 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 16:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 17:11 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 18:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 18:36 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 18:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 18:48 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 19:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 20:27 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 18:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 20:01 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 20:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 20:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 20:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 20:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 21:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 22:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 23:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 23:45 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-07 0:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-07 1:17 ` David Chinner
2006-02-07 9:31 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 11:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-07 12:14 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-07 12:43 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 12:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-07 13:14 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 14:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-07 14:23 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 17:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:29 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 17:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:28 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 17:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:51 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 17:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:26 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-04 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-04 23:57 ` David S. Miller
2006-02-06 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 6:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 6:56 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 7:08 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 8:22 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 8:35 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 9:32 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 9:57 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 9:18 ` Simon Derr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060205215152.27800776.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.