All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: OOM behavior in constrained memory situations
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:23:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602071023.39222.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0602061745480.20189@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Tuesday 07 February 2006 02:55, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> I just tried to oom a process that has restricted its mem allocation to 
> node 0 using a memory policy. Instead of an OOM the system began to swap 
> on node zero. The swapping is restricted to the zones passed to 
> __alloc_pages. It was thus swapping node zero alone.

Thanks for doing that work. It's needed imho and was on my todo list.


>  	switch (pol->policy) {
>  	case MPOL_DEFAULT:
>  		break;
> Index: linux-2.6.16-rc2/include/linux/mempolicy.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc2.orig/include/linux/mempolicy.h	2006-02-02 22:03:08.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc2/include/linux/mempolicy.h	2006-02-06 17:07:41.000000000 -0800
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
>  struct mempolicy {
>  	atomic_t refcnt;
>  	short policy; 	/* See MPOL_* above */
> +	gfp_t gfp_flags;	/* flags ORed into gfp_flags for each allocation */

I don't think it's a good idea to add it to the struct mempolicy. I've tried to
make it as memory efficient as possibile and it would be a waste to add such
a mostly unused field. Better to pass that information around in some other way.

(in the worst case it could be a upper bit in policy, but I would prefer
function arguments I think) 

The rest looks good.

-Andi


  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-07  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-06 20:59 OOM behavior in constrained memory situations Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 21:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 21:22   ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 22:16     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 22:25       ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 22:30       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-07  0:03         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-09 23:08           ` David Gibson
2006-02-06 22:11   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 22:26     ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 22:59 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-07  0:39   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07  1:55   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07  9:23     ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-02-07 17:29       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:45         ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 17:51           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:58             ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 18:10               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 18:19               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 18:31                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 19:00                   ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200602071023.39222.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.