From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hch@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:56:43 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: merge these lists?
Message-ID: <20060207105643.GA22234@lst.de>
References: <17384.5875.790692.127762@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <17384.5875.790692.127762@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:41:39PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> A lot of messages seem to get cross-posted to both linuxppc-dev and
> linuxppc64-dev these days, since we are all working in the one tree.
> Rather than having to cross-post, I propose that we create a single
> powerpc-dev@ozlabs.org list to replace linuxppc-dev and
> linuxppc64-dev.  (The linuxppc-embedded list would continue as at
> present.)

Why not just kill linuxppc64-dev and leave linuxppc-dev?  Probably not
worth to remove the well-known and widely used address just for the
sake of it.