From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1F6Y0H-00023b-Jv for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:55:53 -0800 Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1F6Y0G-0000Jt-E6 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:55:53 -0800 From: Jeff Dike Message-ID: <20060207185707.GB6841@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200602070223.k172NpJa009654@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/8] UML - Define jmpbuf access constants Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 13:57:07 -0500 To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:37:13AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > I assume you have your own setjmp implementation and are not using the > libc version? Nope, that would be the next step if this turned out to be untenable, which I guess it is. > If you don't then there is a problem. There is a good reason why the > constants are removed: you couldn't use the values anyway. Your don't > have the information to "decrypt" them. You're actually encrypting them somehow? How? And why? Is there a reason there can't be an API for looking at the contents of a jmp_buf? Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964770AbWBGS4K (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 13:56:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932110AbWBGS4K (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 13:56:10 -0500 Received: from [198.99.130.12] ([198.99.130.12]:2694 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932216AbWBGS4J (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 13:56:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 13:57:07 -0500 From: Jeff Dike To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] UML - Define jmpbuf access constants Message-ID: <20060207185707.GB6841@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200602070223.k172NpJa009654@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:37:13AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > I assume you have your own setjmp implementation and are not using the > libc version? Nope, that would be the next step if this turned out to be untenable, which I guess it is. > If you don't then there is a problem. There is a good reason why the > constants are removed: you couldn't use the values anyway. Your don't > have the information to "decrypt" them. You're actually encrypting them somehow? How? And why? Is there a reason there can't be an API for looking at the contents of a jmp_buf? Jeff