Re: [SCSI] fix wrong context bugs in SCSI

[Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>]

On Wed, Feb 08 2006, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 09:56 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Hmm, this (and further up) could fail, yet you don't check.
> 
> By and large, you have process context, so this isn't going to be a
> problem.
> 
> > I don't think this API is very nice to be honest, there's no good way to
> > handle failures - you can't just sleep and loop retry the execute if you
> > are in_interrupt(). I'd prefer passing in a work_queue_work (with a
> > better name :-) that has been allocated at a reliable time during
> > initialization.
> 
> Yes, I agree ... however, the failure is less prevalent in the new code
> than the old.  The problem is that we may need to execute multiple puts
> for a single target from irq contex, so under this scheme you need a wqw
> (potentially) for every get.
> 
> I could solve this by binding the API more tightly into the device
> model, so the generic device contains the wqw and it is told that the
> release function of the final put must be called in process context, but
> that's an awful lot of code changes.

Yeah it does get a lot more complicated. I guess I'm fine with the
current change, but please just keep it in SCSI then. It's not the sort
of thing you'd want to advertise as an exported API.

-- 
Jens Axboe