From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernd Schubert Subject: Re: a couple of oopses with 2.6.14 Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:32:11 +0100 Message-ID: <200602100132.12120.bernd-schubert@gmx.de> References: <200602091934.20732.bernd.schubert@pci.uni-heidelberg.de> <20060209152744.00de43f6.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.21]:21211 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750870AbWBJAcP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 19:32:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060209152744.00de43f6.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Hello Andrew and James, thanks for your help. On Friday 10 February 2006 00:27, Andrew Morton wrote: > Bernd Schubert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > here's a machine that works perfectly with 2.6.11, but gives oopes = during > > the boot process with 2.6.14. Unfortunately its everytime another o= ops. > > Usually I would assume its a memory issue, but the machine really w= orks > > perfectly with 2.6.11. > > scsi has had a few problems with error recovery lately. > > > We will run a memory test over the weekend, but so far I don't beli= eve it > > will find anything. > > No, I wouldn't bother doing that. Ok. > > > ------------- example 1 > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > > [4294676.669000] scsi0 : ata_piix > > [4294676.831000] ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xE407 > > So we have a sata problem. It triggered two scsi bugs. The first (a > warning) is being fixed. I don't know if the second has been fixed. I'm not sure if its only a sata problem, I saw several of other oopses,= one=20 was related to Firewire/scsi (ok, could be a consequence of the previou= s sata=20 problem), one came from bluesmoke (external patch) and some of them I=20 couldn't associate to anything (but those I couldn't also capture via=20 netconsole). > > Can you test 2.6.15? > Sure, I will test 2.6.15 this evening. I will also enable most debuggin= g=20 information for this testkernel, ok? Thanks, Bernd PS: For production we unfortunately can't use 2.6.15 - reiserfs trouble= (well,=20 I could try to revert commit 5fa8ad644faa114c4190484ac50e15236fc7cdd9, = but=20 I'm still waiting for an offical statement of the reiserfs poeple) and=20 Win4Lin patches are available up to 2.6.14 only (its the PC of our secr= etary=20 and she really wouldn't like that ;) ). --=20 Bernd Schubert PCI / Theoretische Chemie Universit=E4t Heidelberg INF 229 69120 Heidelberg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750873AbWBJAcQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 19:32:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750876AbWBJAcQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 19:32:16 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21]:20955 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750869AbWBJAcP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 19:32:15 -0500 X-Authenticated: #19095397 From: Bernd Schubert To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: a couple of oopses with 2.6.14 Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:32:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org References: <200602091934.20732.bernd.schubert@pci.uni-heidelberg.de> <20060209152744.00de43f6.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060209152744.00de43f6.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602100132.12120.bernd-schubert@gmx.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Andrew and James, thanks for your help. On Friday 10 February 2006 00:27, Andrew Morton wrote: > Bernd Schubert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > here's a machine that works perfectly with 2.6.11, but gives oopes during > > the boot process with 2.6.14. Unfortunately its everytime another oops. > > Usually I would assume its a memory issue, but the machine really works > > perfectly with 2.6.11. > > scsi has had a few problems with error recovery lately. > > > We will run a memory test over the weekend, but so far I don't believe it > > will find anything. > > No, I wouldn't bother doing that. Ok. > > > ------------- example 1 > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > > [4294676.669000] scsi0 : ata_piix > > [4294676.831000] ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xE407 > > So we have a sata problem. It triggered two scsi bugs. The first (a > warning) is being fixed. I don't know if the second has been fixed. I'm not sure if its only a sata problem, I saw several of other oopses, one was related to Firewire/scsi (ok, could be a consequence of the previous sata problem), one came from bluesmoke (external patch) and some of them I couldn't associate to anything (but those I couldn't also capture via netconsole). > > Can you test 2.6.15? > Sure, I will test 2.6.15 this evening. I will also enable most debugging information for this testkernel, ok? Thanks, Bernd PS: For production we unfortunately can't use 2.6.15 - reiserfs trouble (well, I could try to revert commit 5fa8ad644faa114c4190484ac50e15236fc7cdd9, but I'm still waiting for an offical statement of the reiserfs poeple) and Win4Lin patches are available up to 2.6.14 only (its the PC of our secretary and she really wouldn't like that ;) ). -- Bernd Schubert PCI / Theoretische Chemie Universität Heidelberg INF 229 69120 Heidelberg