From: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@sch.bme.hu>
To: Khoa Nguyen <khoa.coffee@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: SNAT round-robin broken?
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:30:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602132230.48764@krak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d00e6dc0602131301y75cf0398y8c887289b8c994d3@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Monday 13 February 2006 22:01, Khoa Nguyen wrote:
> Before 2.6.11 kernel, the SNAT box was mapping every new socket from
> the Client to a new source IP address. With this, I was able to
> simulate several thousands "virtual" clients. Now with the new
> behaviour, every socket from the Client to the Server is mapped to the
> same random but fixed source IP address. I am sure the new NAT
> implementation is better and cleaner than the old one, but it also
> takes away a nice round-robin feature per socket. Is there any way I
> can achieve the previous behaviour without modifying the kernel source
> code :-( or downgrading to a pre-2.6.11 kernel? (I am writing some
> ip_conntrack/ip_nat modules based on the new 2.6.11+ API, so
> downgrading the kernel is going to be painful)
I see. Well, I don't think this is possible without modifying the kernel
source. However, you could try either modifying the client to use
different IP addresses (by configuring a few thousand IP addresses to the
client and having the client bind() to different IP addresses), or
modifying the kernel to do what you'd like.
I think both of these should be relatively easy (in case you have access
to the client source code). About the kernel: take a look at
find_best_ips_proto() in ip_nat_core.c. At the end of the function
there's a jhash_2words() call, this is responsible for choosing an IP
inside the address range specified. You could easily modify it to produce
a hash value based on the (src, src port, dst) tuple instead of just
(src, dst).
--
KOVACS Krisztian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-13 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-10 15:22 SNAT round-robin broken? Khoa Nguyen
2006-02-10 21:12 ` KOVACS Krisztian
[not found] ` <3d00e6dc0602130610j3ccc1c2cseaf06598999ab0b2@mail.gmail.com>
2006-02-13 20:45 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2006-02-13 21:01 ` Khoa Nguyen
2006-02-13 21:30 ` KOVACS Krisztian [this message]
2006-02-15 21:47 ` Khoa Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200602132230.48764@krak \
--to=hidden@sch.bme.hu \
--cc=khoa.coffee@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.