All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Jody McIntyre <scjody@modernduck.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] don't mangle INQUIRY if cmddt or evpd bits are set
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:40:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060214024049.GB27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F0EBE1.8000001@s5r6.in-berlin.de>

On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Al Viro wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 05:19:55PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> >>BTW, a Prolific based enclosure indeed seems to be unable to handle
> >>CD-ROMs after scsiinfo treatment. An enclosure based on an old
> >>revision of TI StorageLynx apparently causes mode_sense -> check
> >>condition/ unit attention loops when scsiinfo tries to access some
> >>mode page.
> >
> >The former is best treated by using the hardware in question as a pissuary,
> >to make sure that its contents matches the quality of design.
> 
> I have got the impression that most of IEEE 1394a/ USB 2.0 combo bridges 
> on the market are now based on Prolific chips.

Unfortunately.  Finding OXFW911-based ones for about the same price is still
not hard...

> Some more findings:
>  - The TI StorageLynx based bridge reports device type 0 (TYPE_DISK).
>    The problem occurs apparently with page 4 and page 8. Sbp2 has a
>    fix since yesterday which sets the skip_ms_page_8 flag.

That's going to cause fun problems on reboot if it actually has write-behind
cache...

>    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux1394-devel&m=113969287630893
>  - Another bridge made by the same manufacturer but based on TI
>    StorageLynx revision A features the same MODE SENSE bug. This bridge
>    reports type 14 (TYPE_RBC).

Pardon?  If it's type 14, we won't issue MODE SENSE for page 8 and will
go for page 6 instead...

>  - I tested a tenth bridge now, based on Initio INIC-2430F. The bridge
>    reports TYPE_DISK and seems to support all pages which scsiinfo is
>    interested in. Sd_mod is a different story: After sd_mod accesses
>    page 8, the kernel panics. (This is discussed in another thread. The
>    mentioned sbp2 patch catches this bridge as a skip_ms_page_8
>    candidate too, thus avoids the panic. I will eventually check what
>    sd_mod is doing; the sbp2 patch is not the real fix.)

sd_mod issues MODE SENSE from sd_read_cache_size() and does that twice -
once for minimal length to get the length device wants to give and then
for actual length.

> Of course sg does not care for any black list flags (like sd_mod and 
> sr_mod do), but considering the nature of the bugs and anticipated usage 
> of affected devices, there is hardly a reason for further safeguards in 
> sbp2, let alone sg.

Maybe, maybe not.  Note that e.g. aforementioned INQUIRY bug in pl3507 is
triggered by dmraid, which works via SG_IO, just as scsiinfo.  And unlike
scsiinfo it's run from /etc/rc.sysinit on current FC4...

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-14  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-08 20:31 [PATCH 7/8] don't mangle INQUIRY if cmddt or evpd bits are set Al Viro
2006-02-08 22:35 ` Stefan Richter
2006-02-08 23:05   ` Al Viro
2006-02-08 23:51     ` Stefan Richter
2006-02-13 16:19     ` Stefan Richter
2006-02-13 17:03       ` Jody McIntyre
2006-02-13 18:18       ` Al Viro
2006-02-13 20:28         ` Stefan Richter
2006-02-14  2:40           ` Al Viro [this message]
2006-02-14  8:37             ` Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060214024049.GB27946@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=scjody@modernduck.com \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.