From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: carsteno@de.ibm.com
Cc: cotte@de.ibm.com, hch@lst.de, horst.hummel@de.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, heicars2@de.ibm.com,
wein@de.ibm.com, mschwid2@de.ibm.com, ihno@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] new dasd ioctl patchkit
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:03:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060215120343.1e4e8afe.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F3397B.3090207@de.ibm.com>
Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > As long as we backout the bogus eer
> > patch before 2.6.16 all the cleanups and even the eckd ioctl fix
> > can wait. But don't put this crappy interface into 1.6.16 and thus
> > SLES10 so that applications start to rely on it.
> ACK: Given that a) both Horst and Christoph think the ioctl interface
> needs cleanup but proposed cleanup interfers with existing
> functionality (cmb), and b) later cleanup would change the
> user-interface of eer, we should rush neither the ioctl change nor
> eer into .16 until the maintainer is back afaics.
>
I don't have a patch in hand to purely back out the eer modeule. What I
have is
dasd-cleanup-dasd_ioctl.patch
dasd-cleanup-dasd_ioctl-fix.patch
dasd-add-per-disciple-ioctl-method.patch
dasd-merge-dasd_cmd-into-dasd_mod.patch
dasd-backout-dasd_eer-module.patch
dasd-kill-dynamic-ioctl-registration.patch
So what do we do?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-15 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-14 16:53 [PATCH 0/5] new dasd ioctl patchkit Horst Hummel
2006-02-14 19:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-02-15 14:23 ` Carsten Otte
2006-02-15 20:03 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-02-16 5:46 ` Heiko Carstens
2006-02-15 21:14 ` Stefan Weinhuber
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-12 17:38 Christoph Hellwig
2006-02-13 7:04 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060215120343.1e4e8afe.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=carsteno@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=heicars2@de.ibm.com \
--cc=horst.hummel@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ihno@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mschwid2@de.ibm.com \
--cc=wein@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.