From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb To: Stephen Smalley Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] collect security labels on user processes generating audit messages Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:35:15 -0500 Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, James Morris References: <200602160956.20357.sgrubb@redhat.com> <1140103740.12655.79.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1140103740.12655.79.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <200602161035.15321.sgrubb@redhat.com> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Thursday 16 February 2006 10:29, Stephen Smalley wrote: > Except for what other code should do about NULL pointers in output.  If > they defer it to vsnprintf, they will end up with in the output. > So should Tim's code be checking for !ctx and outputting (null) there as > well? Yes, I think that would be consistent will all the other audit code. -Steve -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.