From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] lockd: stop abusing file_lock_list
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:57:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060216135734.GA3393@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1140065071.8209.3.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit, Size: 1975 bytes --]
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:44:31PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Author: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> lockd: Fix Oopses due to list manipulation errors.
>
> The patch "stop abusing file_lock_list introduces a couple of bugs since
> the locks may be copied and need to be removed from the lists when they are
> destroyed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> ---
>
> fs/lockd/clntproc.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/lockd/clntproc.c b/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
> index 211113a..b1b924d 100644
> --- a/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
> +++ b/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
> @@ -447,12 +447,17 @@ static void nlmclnt_locks_copy_lock(stru
> {
> memcpy(&new->fl_u.nfs_fl, &fl->fl_u.nfs_fl, sizeof(new->fl_u.nfs_fl));
> nlm_get_lockowner(new->fl_u.nfs_fl.owner);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->fl_u.nfs_fl.list);
> + if (!list_empty(&fl->fl_u.nfs_fl.list))
> + list_add(&new->fl_u.nfs_fl.list, &fl->fl_u.nfs_fl.list);
list_add initializes ænough so we don't need the INIT_LIST_HEAD in that
case, so this could become:
if (list_empty(&fl->fl_u.nfs_fl.list))
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->fl_u.nfs_fl.list);
else
list_add(&new->fl_u.nfs_fl.list, &fl->fl_u.nfs_fl.list);
> * Remove from the granted list now so the lock doesn't get
> * reclaimed while we're stuck in the unlock call.
> */
> - list_del(&fl->fl_u.nfs_fl.list);
> + if (!list_empty(&fl->fl_u.nfs_fl.list))
> + list_del_init(&fl->fl_u.nfs_fl.list);
Probably should be just unconditionaly. list_del_init isn't a whole lot
of instructions, but we save a branch and have more readable code.
While we're at it, don't we need a INIT_LIST_HEAD in
nlmclnt_locks_init_private aswell?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-16 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-14 19:20 [PATCH, RFC] lockd: stop abusing file_lock_list Christoph Hellwig
2006-02-14 22:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-02-16 4:44 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-02-16 10:23 ` Jens Axboe
2006-02-16 13:46 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-02-16 13:57 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2006-02-16 14:21 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060216135734.GA3393@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.