From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, dada1@cosmosbay.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fix file counting
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:36:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060218100629.GQ29846@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060218014529.5f160d39.akpm@osdl.org>
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 01:45:29AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Slight optimization -
> >
> > if (get_nr_files() >= files_stat.max_files) {
> > if (capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
> > /*
> > * percpu_counters are inaccurate. Do an expensive check before
> > * we go and fail.
> > */
> > if (percpu_counter_sum(&nr_files) >=
> > files_stat.max_files)
> > goto over;
> > } else
> > goto over;
> > }
>
> That changes the behaviour for root. Maybe you meant !capable(), but that
> still changes the behaviour. I'm all confused.
Hmm.. on second thoughts, there is no harm doing the expensive check
for both priviledged and non-priviledged user. It will correctly
allow non-priviledged users to create the new file provided
the fast-path percpu counter value returned was greater than the
slow path per-cpu counter value.
Just ignore my comment in the previous mail.
Thanks
Dipankar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-18 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-17 15:41 [PATCH 0/2] RCU updates Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-17 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] rcu batch tuning Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-17 15:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] fix file counting Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-18 9:04 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-18 9:25 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-18 9:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-18 10:06 ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2006-02-18 10:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-18 10:44 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-18 12:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-02-18 12:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-20 22:36 ` [2.6 patch] make UNIX a bool Adrian Bunk
2006-02-17 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] rcu batch tuning Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-18 8:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-18 9:15 ` Dipankar Sarma
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-26 18:40 [patch 0/2] RCU: fix various latency/oom issues Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-26 18:41 ` [patch 1/2] rcu batch tuning Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-26 18:42 ` [patch 2/2] fix file counting Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-26 20:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-27 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-27 23:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-27 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-28 18:42 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-28 18:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-28 19:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-30 17:00 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-31 10:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-31 20:19 ` Dipankar Sarma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060218100629.GQ29846@in.ibm.com \
--to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.