From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FB5Sp-0005Gy-KN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:28:07 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FB5Sn-0005Ac-QQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:28:07 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FB5Sn-00059y-0i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:28:05 -0500
Received: from [66.54.152.27] (helo=jive.SoftHome.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FB5Yl-00031I-Ow
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:34:15 -0500
From: Mulyadi Santosa <a_mulyadi@softhome.net>
Subject: Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] new entry in Qemu forum-- Andre Pech's fix on
	gdbstub
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:58:22 +0700
References: <200602131206.49371.a_mulyadi@softhome.net>
	<200602191539.14532.paul@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <200602191539.14532.paul@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200602201158.22317.a_mulyadi@softhome.net>
Reply-To: a_mulyadi@softhome.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Andre Pech <andre.pech@gmail.com>

Hi...

On Sunday 19 February 2006 22:39, Paul Brook wrote:
> This patch is not sufficient.
>
> There seems to be some inconsistency whether cpu_get_phys_page_debug
> returns the physical address or the base address of the page.

Hm, I am not so sure either. Anyway, using cscope to find out which 
functions that calls cpu_phys_page_debug, seems like it is only called 
during breakpoint setup. So, what ever we do inside 
cpu_get_phys_page_debug doesn't seem affecting other places.

BTW, do you have any suggestions on where should fix this problem?

regards

Mulyadi