From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751586AbWBWA1n (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:27:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751590AbWBWA1n (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:27:43 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:59803 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751582AbWBWA1m (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:27:42 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:29:51 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] refine for_each_pgdat() [1/4] refine for_each_pgdat Message-Id: <20060222162951.0e28a9aa.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <43FCFFC0.1050405@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20060222200402.e1145286.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20060222145256.7b84f444.akpm@osdl.org> <43FCFFC0.1050405@jp.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > It's confusing and asymmetric. If you have time, it would be nice to later > > remove for_each_pgdat() and for_each_cpu() from the kernel altogether, use > > for_each_online_cpu(), for_each_possible_cpu(), for_each_online_node(), > > for_each_possible_node(). > > > Okay, I'll rewrite my patch and post new one which represents what you mention. Well, only do that if it's appropriate to the context of that patch. I was more thinking that this renaming would be a separate exercise, to be done once things in that area calm down a bit. > BTW, I noticed refine-for_each_pgdat-remove-pgdat-sorting.patch > contains bug. (caller of ia64's insert_pgdat() is not removed...) > > so please drop them :(, I'll post new ones to next -mm (with enough test...). OK..