All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
To: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc1 crash in scsi_target_reap_work
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:47:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060222164750.GA433@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43FC774B.8050301@us.ibm.com>

Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> I would guess that the -EEXIST is coming from:
> 
> create_dir
> sysfs_create_dir
> create_dir
> kobject_add
> device_add
> 
> Looking at the scsi_target reap code, it looks like there is a race condition. The
> target is removed from the hosts list of targets under the host lock, then the host
> lock is released. If another thread tries to add the same target that is being
> tore down at this point (before device_del), the device_add will fail with EEXIST
> since the sysfs directory for the device still exists.
> 
> Any reason we can't protect the target reaping code from this by grabbing the 
> scan_mutex?


Another manifestation is a bug I was recently looking at where a BUG_ON is
triggered in the aic7xxx driver if someone is removing and adding devices
repeatably.

"Feb  8 14:21:52 test klogd: kernel BUG at
drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c:535!"

The scan mutex I believe would not help in the case I describe above as
the issue in this instance is the widow between the call of
"list_del_init(&starget->siblings);" and the call to target_destroy.

-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@us.ibm.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-22 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-17  0:05 2.6.15-git12, slab corruption in ipr Olaf Hering
2006-01-18 18:42 ` Brian King
2006-01-19 21:05   ` Olaf Hering
2006-01-30 10:46     ` Olaf Hering
2006-01-30 16:49       ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-06 22:04         ` 2.6.16-rc1 crash in scsi_target_reap_work Olaf Hering
2006-02-06 22:26           ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-06 22:44           ` James Bottomley
2006-02-09 20:05             ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-10 10:11               ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-10 14:04                 ` James Bottomley
2006-02-10 14:10                   ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-10 23:01                     ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-10 23:21                       ` Brian King
2006-02-10 23:29                         ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-11 10:34                           ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-20 23:00                           ` Brian King
2006-02-22  8:36                             ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-22 14:38                               ` Brian King
2006-02-22 15:53                                 ` Olaf Hering
2006-02-22 16:47                                 ` Mike Anderson [this message]
2006-02-22 17:05                                   ` James Bottomley
2006-02-10 21:28                   ` Brian King
2006-01-30 18:07 ` 2.6.15-git12, slab corruption in ipr Olaf Hering

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060222164750.GA433@us.ibm.com \
    --to=andmike@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olh@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.