From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>,
Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lsscsi-0.17 released
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:14:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060222171438.GA20272@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060222163426.GG28587@parisc-linux.org>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 09:34:26AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:27:16AM -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> > Matthias Andree wrote:
> > > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> > >>Matthias Andree wrote:
> > >>>Does this work around new incompatibilities in the kernel
> > >>>or does this fix lsscsi bugs?
> > >>
> > >>The former. In lk 2.6.16-rc1 the
> > >>/sys/class/scsi_device/<hcil>/device/block symlink
> > >>changed to ".../block:sd<x>" breaking lsscsi 0.16 (and
> > >>earlier) and sg_map26 (in sg3_utils).
> > >
> > > Heck, what was the reason for breaking userspace again?
> >
> > Maybe the person responsible can answer. I'm only reacting
> > to a change that broke two of my utilities.
>
> Probably better to cc the person responsible if you want an answer.
It was changed as there would be more than one "block" symlink in a
device's directory if more than one block device was attached to a
single struct device. For example, ub and multi-lun devices (there were
other reports of this happening for scsi devices too at the time from
what I remember.)
So, in that case, your tool would have been broken anyway, so this fix
was required to make it correct :)
The fix was to make block devices work the same way as all other class
devices, which had this fix a while ago.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-22 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-21 23:39 lsscsi-0.17 released Douglas Gilbert
2006-02-22 8:50 ` Matthias Andree
2006-02-22 15:01 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-02-22 16:06 ` Matthias Andree
2006-02-22 16:27 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-02-22 16:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-02-22 16:38 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-02-22 17:14 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-02-22 18:00 ` Matthias Andree
2006-02-22 18:32 ` Greg KH
2006-02-22 20:22 ` Matthias Andree
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-22 17:59 Douglas Gilbert
2006-02-22 18:37 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060222171438.GA20272@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=matthias.andree@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.