From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FMODE_EXEC or alike?
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:57:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060222195721.GC28219@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1140564751.8088.35.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 06:32:31PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Hmm... I don't think you want to overload write deny bits onto
> FMODE_EXEC. FMODE_EXEC is basically, a read-only mode, so it
> would mean that you could no longer do something like
>
> OPEN(READ|WRITE,DENY_WRITE)
>
> which I would assume is one of the more frequent Windoze open modes.
Since exec will never use the above combination, I don't think the
current proposal mandates any particular semantics in that case.
So I'm assuming that we could choose the semantics to fit nfsd's
purposes. Am I missing anything?
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-22 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-20 22:19 FMODE_EXEC or alike? Oleg Drokin
2006-02-21 5:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-21 11:30 ` Oleg Drokin
2006-02-21 11:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-21 11:56 ` Oleg Drokin
2006-02-21 13:59 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-02-21 14:15 ` Antonio Vargas
2006-02-21 14:21 ` Oleg Drokin
2006-02-22 9:57 ` Antonio Vargas
2006-02-21 14:42 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-02-21 23:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-02-21 23:32 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-02-22 19:57 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2006-02-22 21:36 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-02-22 22:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-02-22 22:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-02-22 23:31 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-02-21 10:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-02-22 1:03 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-02-22 8:59 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-02-22 21:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-02-22 22:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060222195721.GC28219@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=green@linuxhacker.ru \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.