From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Hesse, Christian" Subject: Re: hald in status D with 2.6.16-rc4 Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:36:31 +0100 Message-ID: <200602222336.31562.mail@earthworm.de> References: <200602202034.29413.mail@earthworm.de> <200602221110.44813.mail@earthworm.de> <200602222109.21816.ncunningham@cyclades.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2813255.RpKh75hPNk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from lugor.de ([212.112.242.222]:40158 "EHLO solar.mylinuxtime.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751575AbWBVWg4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:36:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200602222109.21816.ncunningham@cyclades.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org --nextPart2813255.RpKh75hPNk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 22 February 2006 12:09, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. Hi Nigel, > On Wednesday 22 February 2006 20:10, Hesse, Christian wrote: > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 23:49, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > "Hesse, Christian" wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:19, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > "Hesse, Christian" wrote: > > > > > > Hello everybody, > > > > > > > > > > > > since using kernel version 2.6.16-rc4 the hal daemon is in stat= us > > > > > > D after resume. I use suspend2 2.2.0.1 for 2.6.16-rc3. Any hints > > > > > > what could be the problem? It worked perfectly with 2.6.15.x and > > > > > > suspend2 2.2. > > > > > > > > > > a) Look in the logs for any oopses, other nasties > > > > > > > > Nothing. > > > > > > > > > b) Do `echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger', `dmesg -s 1000000 > foo' th= en > > > > > find the trace for `hald' in `foo', send it to this list. > > > > > > > > Ok, here it is: > > > > > > > > [ trace snipped ] > > > > > > > > This is with 2.6.16-rc4-git1 + suspend2 2.2.0.1. > > > > > > Hopefully suspend2 isn't involved. People would feel more comfortable > > > if you could test a vanilla mainline tree.. > > > > > > Could the ACPI team please take a look at fixing this regression? > > > > I did two cycles with mainline suspend now and did not hit the problem.= =2E. > > I will keep an eye on it. > > Could you let me know how you go? I didn't make any changes between 2.2 a= nd > 2.2.0.1 that I think could cause this, but if you can't reproduce it > otherwise, I'll happily look again. You just missed my last mail. It happens with mainline suspend as well, so = it=20 is not your fault. Regards, =2D-=20 Christian --nextPart2813255.RpKh75hPNk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.20 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD/OdvlZfG2c8gdSURAmGWAJ9m4+BfFryXNwWpaDk1YBdqfJ7cvACgnVDO bpQEXcWoGYmY3b8+5Fa3ET0= =MJBg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2813255.RpKh75hPNk--