From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Status of X86_P4_CLOCKMOD? Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:55:30 +0100 Message-ID: <200602240055.30603.ak@suse.de> References: <20060214152218.GI10701@stusta.de> <200602240016.00317.ak@suse.de> <20060223233328.GB3674@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060223233328.GB3674@stusta.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Dave Jones , Dmitry Torokhov , davej@codemonkey.org.uk, Zwane Mwaikambo , Samuel Masham , Jan Engelhardt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk On Friday 24 February 2006 00:33, Adrian Bunk wrote: > EMBEDDED is the wrong option, since the semantics of embedded is "show > more options to allow additional space savings". It is not and should > not be abused as an option to hide random options from users. I disagree. And I originally added most EMBEDDED users to the kernel. The purpose I added it for was to hide options that only useful for a very limited userbase but cause big or subtle trouble when set wrong. P4_CLOCKMOD clearly qualifies. -Andi