From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/13] ATA ACPI: debugging infrastructure Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:22:02 -0800 Message-ID: <20060228112202.5355ca43.randy_d_dunlap@linux.intel.com> References: <20060222133241.595a8509.randy_d_dunlap@linux.intel.com> <20060222135133.3f80fbf9.randy_d_dunlap@linux.intel.com> <20060228114500.GA4057@elf.ucw.cz> <44043B4E.30907@pobox.com> <20060228041817.6fc444d2.akpm@osdl.org> <440461AA.1090907@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fmr20.intel.com ([134.134.136.19]:54690 "EHLO orsfmr005.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932448AbWB1TTw (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:19:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <440461AA.1090907@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: akpm@osdl.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:43:54 -0500 Mark Lord wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> Fine-grained > >> message selection allows one to turn on only the messages needed, and > >> only for the controller desired. > > > > Except > > > > - There's (presently) no way of making all the messages go away for a > > non-debug build. > > Agreed. We need a way to make them all really go away > for embedded builds -- memory matters there. That's a libata infrastructure issue, not an ATA-ACPI issue. I'll go with whatever $maintainer decides. ~Randy