From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 08:39:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060301133913.GB16840@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602282234120.28074@montezuma.fsmlabs.com>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:36:09PM -0800, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> > The number of systems that actually *need* APIC enabled are in the
> > vast (though growing) minority, so it's unlikely that most newbies
> > will hit this. The problem is also the inverse of what you describe.
> > Typically the distros have DMI lists of machines that *need* APIC
> > to make it enabled by default so everything 'just works'.
> >
> > The big problem the patch solves is allowing it to be possible
> > to build a kernel with UP APIC code, but disabled by default
> > (Because there a lot of older machines that die horribly if it
> > was enabled by default).
>
> The current policy is off if it was disabled by the BIOS. Is the intention
> of this patch to have it off unconditionally unless explicitely enabled by
> kernel parameter?
Yes, (or forced on by dmi string)
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-01 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-20 1:20 [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386 Darrick J. Wong
2006-01-20 14:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-01 3:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-03-01 4:33 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-01 5:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-03-01 13:38 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-01 13:52 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-03-01 6:36 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2006-03-01 13:39 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2006-03-01 21:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2006-03-01 22:14 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-01 22:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2006-03-01 22:51 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-01 23:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2006-03-06 12:50 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-06 17:17 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-06 17:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-06 17:52 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-06 17:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-06 18:17 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-06 19:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060301133913.GB16840@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.