From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>,
Ren? Rebe <rene@exactcode.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:41:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060301224123.GA10422@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060301223430.GA9159@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 11:34:30PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:54:23PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:42:35PM +0100, Ren? Rebe wrote:
> > > So, queing alot URBs is the recommended way to sustain the bus? Allowing
> > > way bigger buffers will not be realistic?
> >
> > 16Kb is "way big" in the USB scheme of things aready. Look at the size
> > of your endpoint. It's probably _very_ small compared to that. So no,
> > larger buffer sizes is not realistic at all.
>
> As a data point, I have traces of a scanner session including a
> download of a 26Mb binary image using 524288 bytes logical blocks
> physically transferred with 61440 bytes bulk_in frames. Seems stable
> enough. IIRC the scanner-side controller chip has some advanced
> buffering just to handle that kind of bandwidth.
That's impressive. What are the endpoint sizes on the device that did
this?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-01 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-01 20:16 MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE René Rebe
2006-03-01 20:53 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Oliver Neukum
2006-03-01 21:32 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Greg KH
2006-03-01 21:42 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE René Rebe
2006-03-01 21:54 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Greg KH
2006-03-01 22:34 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Olivier Galibert
2006-03-01 22:41 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-03-01 23:25 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Olivier Galibert
2006-03-01 23:37 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Greg KH
2006-03-02 9:04 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE René Rebe
2006-03-02 16:47 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Greg KH
2006-03-02 16:03 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE René Rebe
2006-03-02 16:47 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Greg KH
2006-03-01 21:59 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Duncan Sands
2006-03-03 10:34 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Oliver Neukum
[not found] ` <mailman.1141249502.22706.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2006-03-02 21:05 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Pete Zaitcev
2006-03-03 7:27 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE René Rebe
2006-03-03 20:32 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Greg KH
2006-03-03 8:12 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Duncan Sands
2006-03-03 10:29 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060301224123.GA10422@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=galibert@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rene@exactcode.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.