From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU. Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 02:38:31 +0100 Message-ID: <200603020238.31639.ak@suse.de> References: <20060301224647.GD1440@redhat.com> <200603020155.46534.ak@suse.de> <20060302011959.GC19755@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35774 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751317AbWCBBgi (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 20:36:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060302011959.GC19755@redhat.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Jones Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ashok Raj > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) > Processor #0 15:5 APIC version 16 > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x01] enabled) > Processor #1 15:5 APIC version 16 > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x03] lapic_id[0x82] disabled) > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x04] lapic_id[0x83] disabled) It's because of the two disabled CPUs. We decreed at some point that disabled CPUs mean hotpluggable CPUs. But it's doing this for some time so you probably only noticed now. All is ok. Sorry for blaming you wrongly, Ashok. -Andi