From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Boxman Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 16:18:00 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Patch to allow for the ATM "cell tax" Message-Id: <200603031118.00804.jasonb@edseek.com> List-Id: References: <1141284603.10264.168.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> In-Reply-To: <1141284603.10264.168.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Friday 03 March 2006 08:43, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:27:13PM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote: > > Any chance something like this can be applied to q_tbf? It's been > > classful for a while and I find a tbf with a prio under it works quite > > well for my > > tbf qdisc is classfull? It has been since like 2.6.9, yes. I was as surprised as you, but I use it with a leaf prio all the time and have for a year now. -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc