Re: [LARTC] Patch to allow for the ATM "cell tax"

[Andreas Hasenack <ahasenack@terra.com.br>]

On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:18:00AM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote:
> On Friday 03 March 2006 08:43, Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:27:13PM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote:
> > > Any chance something like this can be applied to q_tbf?  It's been
> > > classful for a while and I find a tbf with a prio under it works quite
> > > well for my
> >
> > tbf qdisc is classfull?
> 
> It has been since like 2.6.9, yes.  I was as surprised as you, but I use it 
> with a leaf prio all the time and have for a year now.

If this is correct, then the docs are really in bad shape. They are not only
outdated, but just plain wrong in many cases.

But tbf is still not your regular classfull qdisc, or I'm missinterpreting things:

# tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root tbf rate 300kbit burst 10k latency 10ms
# tc class add dev eth0 classid 1:1 parent 1: tbf
Error: Qdisc "tbf" is classless.

or

# tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root tbf rate 300kbit burst 10k latency 10ms
# tc class add dev eth0 classid 1:1 parent 1: prio
Error: Qdisc "prio" is classless.

I'm using iproute2-2.6.15 and kernel-2.6.12

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc