From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1FG1ZU-0006Gk-CC for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 17:19:24 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FG1ZS-0006AQ-7R for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 17:19:22 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FG1ZO-0005qf-RX for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 17:19:21 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FG1ZO-0005q4-NQ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 17:19:18 -0500 Received: from [212.85.152.101] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FG1bV-000409-Ne for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 17:21:29 -0500 Received: from kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com (kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com [212.85.152.101]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0616E3C780D1B for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 00:16:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [??1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FF93C780D19 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 00:16:00 +0100 (CET) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:19:11 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <43FA48DD.8090509@nic.fi> <44005AB8.7030408@nic.fi> <44061EF7.4010408@nic.fi> In-Reply-To: <44061EF7.4010408@nic.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603052219.11335.okuji@enbug.org> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.479505, version=0.17.2 Subject: Re: Terminal interface and how it should be used? X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 22:19:22 -0000 On Wednesday 01 March 2006 22:23, Vesa J=E4=E4skel=E4inen wrote: > But basicly in this stage I think drivers for the other archs could be > started to be written. The driver interface seems to be good enough for > our use. Any ideas what would be a good point when we migrate the code > back to CVS ? I like to have the code in the CVS as soon as possible. Okuji