From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
markhe@nextd.demon.co.uk, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Subject: Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 21:30:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060306203036.GQ4595@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603062124.42223.jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 06 2006, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Monday 06 March 2006 21:06, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > So it's either an aic7xxx bug, or it's generic SCSI.
> > >
> > > Considering that we've had other slab corruption issues (the reason I was
> > > looking closely at yours), generic SCSI isn't out of the question.
> > >
> > > If you were a git user, doing a bisection run would be useful since you
> > > seem to be able to recreate it at will. Oh, well. Testign that one patch
> > > would still help.
> >
>
> Since the patch you sent me didn't apply cleanly to the mm kernel I made the
> changes by hand. This is what I ended up with (should be the same end result
> as what you intended as far as I can see) :
>
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2-orig/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2006-03-05 23:43:56.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2006-03-06 21:13:53.000000000 +0100
> @@ -260,7 +260,6 @@ int scsi_execute(struct scsi_device *sde
> memcpy(req->cmd, cmd, req->cmd_len);
> req->sense = sense;
> req->sense_len = 0;
> - req->retries = retries;
> req->timeout = timeout;
> req->flags |= flags | REQ_BLOCK_PC | REQ_SPECIAL | REQ_QUIET;
>
> @@ -478,7 +477,6 @@ int scsi_execute_async(struct scsi_devic
> req->sense = sioc->sense;
> req->sense_len = 0;
> req->timeout = timeout;
> - req->retries = retries;
> req->end_io_data = sioc;
>
> sioc->data = privdata;
> @@ -1240,7 +1238,7 @@ static void scsi_setup_blk_pc_cmnd(struc
> cmd->sc_data_direction = DMA_FROM_DEVICE;
>
> cmd->transfersize = req->data_len;
> - cmd->allowed = req->retries;
> + cmd->allowed = 3;
> cmd->timeout_per_command = req->timeout;
> cmd->done = scsi_blk_pc_done;
> }
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2-orig/block/scsi_ioctl.c 2006-03-05 23:43:41.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2/block/scsi_ioctl.c 2006-03-06 21:16:19.000000000 +0100
> @@ -314,8 +314,6 @@ static int sg_io(struct file *file, requ
> if (!rq->timeout)
> rq->timeout = BLK_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT;
>
> - rq->retries = 0;
> -
> start_time = jiffies;
>
> /* ignore return value. All information is passed back to caller
> @@ -433,7 +431,6 @@ static int sg_scsi_ioctl(struct file *fi
> rq->data = buffer;
> rq->data_len = bytes;
> rq->flags |= REQ_BLOCK_PC;
> - rq->retries = 0;
>
> blk_execute_rq(q, bd_disk, rq, 0);
> err = rq->errors & 0xff; /* only 8 bit SCSI status */
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2-orig/include/linux/blkdev.h 2006-03-05 23:44:06.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2/include/linux/blkdev.h 2006-03-06 21:13:02.000000000 +0100
> @@ -190,7 +190,6 @@ struct request {
> void *sense;
>
> unsigned int timeout;
> - int retries;
>
> /*
> * For Power Management requests
>
>
> Unfortunately that didn't fix it. After booting the patched kernel I found
> this in dmesg :
I don't see how it could be, honestly, we would gladly oops in locally
close places if that was the case. If you disable slab debug/poison, do
you get a nice NULL pointer dereference instead? There have been some
reports on a NULL queue for sr devices as of lately, I wonder if some
SCSI change recently was broken.
Tejun, I seem to recall you looking at this, but I can't seem to locate
the thread. Did anything come of it?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-06 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-06 0:17 Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2 Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 18:43 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 19:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 19:51 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 19:58 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 20:24 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 20:30 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2006-03-06 20:33 ` Jens Axboe
2006-03-06 21:14 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 21:41 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 21:55 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-06 21:57 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-09 15:50 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-03-09 15:54 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-03-09 15:54 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-09 16:04 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-03-09 16:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-09 16:41 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-06 20:36 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 20:53 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 20:56 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 21:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 21:16 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 21:54 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 22:05 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-06 22:08 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 22:27 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 22:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 22:52 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 22:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 23:01 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-06 23:24 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-07 0:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-07 0:25 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-07 3:15 ` Mike Christie
2006-03-07 3:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-07 18:01 ` James Bottomley
2006-03-07 19:40 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-07 8:47 ` [PATCH] slab: fix offslab_limit in calculate_slab_order (Was: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2) Pekka J Enberg
2006-03-07 17:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-07 19:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-03-07 19:28 ` Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2 Bill Davidsen
2006-03-06 22:44 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 18:48 ` Mike Christie
2006-03-06 18:49 ` Mike Christie
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-08 6:25 Chuck Ebbert
2006-03-08 8:32 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08 8:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08 9:02 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08 9:12 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08 9:23 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08 14:35 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060306203036.GQ4595@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markhe@nextd.demon.co.uk \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.