From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Michael Bender <Michael.Bender@Sun.COM>
Cc: s.schmidt@avm.de, kkeil@suse.de,
libusb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org,
opensuse-factory@opensuse.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Libusb-devel] Re: 2.6.16 serious consequences / GPL_EXPORT_SYMBOL / USB drivers of major vendor excluded
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:02:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060306220225.GA20265@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <440CA520.8070507@sun.com>
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:09:52PM -0800, Michael Bender wrote:
> (Since this came to me via the libusb list, and we've kind of
> gone past libusb-specific-related discussion, I thought I'd
> add another question to the thread).
>
> What's the rationale behind the dichotomy between userspace
> and kernel licensing models?
Hm, how about starting a new thread for this? As it's way outside the
scope of this one, _and_ it's pretty much off-topic for all of these
lists :)
As for the rationale, see the lkml archives for details.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-06 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200601200904.00389.dazzle.digital@gmail.com>
2006-02-03 16:24 ` 2.6.16 serious consequences / GPL_EXPORT_SYMBOL / USB drivers of major vendor excluded s.schmidt
2006-02-03 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-04 16:27 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-02-04 19:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2006-02-09 15:52 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-02-05 20:53 ` Greg KH
2006-02-16 14:24 ` Re[2]: " s.schmidt
2006-02-16 14:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-16 19:49 ` [opensuse-factory] " Robert Schiele
2006-02-16 22:09 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2006-02-16 22:51 ` Karsten Keil
2006-02-17 23:00 ` Greg KH
2006-02-19 14:34 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2006-03-06 12:47 ` Re[2]: " s.schmidt
2006-03-06 17:05 ` Greg KH
2006-03-06 21:09 ` [Libusb-devel] " Michael Bender
2006-03-06 22:02 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-03-07 7:42 ` [opensuse-factory] Re[2]: " Silviu Marin-Caea
2006-03-07 22:10 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-07 23:37 ` Matthias Andree
2006-03-08 0:55 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-08 1:39 ` Douglas McNaught
2006-02-18 2:42 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-19 4:57 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2006-02-19 17:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-02-20 3:11 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2006-02-20 6:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-02-19 16:25 ` Re[2]: " Christoph Hellwig
2006-02-19 3:09 ` Anton Blanchard
2006-02-19 3:20 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060306220225.GA20265@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=Michael.Bender@Sun.COM \
--cc=kkeil@suse.de \
--cc=libusb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opensuse-factory@opensuse.org \
--cc=s.schmidt@avm.de \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.