From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: libata: why do we need to define ATA_ENABLE_PATA instead of a CONFIG option?
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 17:04:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060307010444.GA6799@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Currently, we can use the piix ide driver for Intel ICH5 IDE controllers, or
use ata_piix (libata) by #defining ATA_ENABLE_PATA manually at
inclulde/linux/libata.h. Why not have a CONFIG option to enable libata for such
drivers instead of a #define in the code? I was wondering if there is any
reason it is done this way.
Thanks,
Kiran
next reply other threads:[~2006-03-07 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-07 1:04 Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2006-03-07 5:18 ` libata: why do we need to define ATA_ENABLE_PATA instead of a CONFIG option? Jeff Garzik
2006-03-07 6:00 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060307010444.GA6799@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.