From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joshua N Pritikin Subject: Re: git-status too verbose? Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:05:47 +0530 Message-ID: <20060307053547.GK6346@always.joy.eth.net> References: <38b80e980603040952j15152a21h2c903bd011d7e905@mail.gmail.com> <7vacc36r4v.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 07 06:26:47 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FGUiV-00032N-OU for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 06:26:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751188AbWCGF0h (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2006 00:26:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751195AbWCGF0h (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2006 00:26:37 -0500 Received: from proof.pobox.com ([207.106.133.28]:31142 "EHLO proof.pobox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751188AbWCGF0g (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2006 00:26:36 -0500 Received: from proof (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by proof.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC368F9D8; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 00:26:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from emit.nirmalvihar.info (house.nirmalvihar.info [61.17.90.7]) by proof.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353C023566; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 00:26:32 -0500 (EST) Received: by emit.nirmalvihar.info (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:05:47 +0530 To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vacc36r4v.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-PGP-Key: 06E3 3D22 D307 AAE6 ACB4 6B44 A9CA A794 A4A6 0BBD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 04:21:52PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > HEAD->index index->files > ------------------------------------------------ > hello.c unmodified modified > world.c modified unmodified > frotz.c new unmodified > ... > garbage.c~ ??? n/a For what it's worth, this chart immediately made sense to me and I would prefer it to the current git-status output.