From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Dave Peterson <dsp@llnl.gov>, Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
dthompson@lnxi.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: core EDAC support code
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 20:03:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603072003.42327.dtor_core@ameritech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060307170401.GA6989@kroah.com>
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 12:04, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:47:44AM -0800, Dave Peterson wrote:
> > Ok, how does this sound:
> >
> > - Modify EDAC so it uses kmalloc() to create the kobject.
> > - Eliminate edac_memctrl_master_release(). Instead, use kfree() as
> > the release method for the kobject. Here, it's important to use a
> > function -outside- of EDAC as the release method since the core
> > EDAC module may have been unloaded by the time the release method
> > is called.
>
> No, if this happens then you are using the kobject incorrectly. How
> could it be held if your module is unloaded? Don't you have the module
> reference counting logic correct?
>
It is pretty hard to implement kobject handling correctly. Consider the
following:
rmmod device_driver < /sys/devices/pci0000:00/...../power/state
for a driver that creates/destroys device objects.
Opening 'state' attribute will pin device structure into memory but will
not increase _your_ module's refcount. It is nice if you have a subsystem
core split from drivers code - then you can keep core module reference
until device objects are gone and allow individual drivers be unloaded
freely. But for single-module system it is pretty hard, that's why
platform devices are popular.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-08 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200601190414.k0J4EZCV021775@hera.kernel.org>
2006-03-05 10:18 ` [PATCH] EDAC: core EDAC support code Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-05 10:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-06 18:14 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-06 18:22 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-07 17:03 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-07 17:20 ` Greg KH
2006-03-08 0:29 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-07 19:03 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-07 19:05 ` Greg KH
2006-03-09 23:51 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-10 0:02 ` Greg KH
2006-03-10 1:46 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-10 7:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10 11:06 ` Tim Small
2006-03-10 11:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10 17:46 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-10 17:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10 19:07 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-10 19:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10 21:13 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-10 21:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-11 1:57 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-11 7:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-13 19:31 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-06 19:52 ` Greg KH
2006-03-05 15:55 ` Greg KH
2006-03-05 16:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-06 18:52 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-06 19:53 ` Greg KH
2006-03-06 21:01 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-06 21:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-09 3:19 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-09 3:44 ` Al Viro
2006-03-09 5:51 ` Greg KH
2006-03-06 21:32 ` Al Viro
2006-03-06 21:53 ` Greg KH
2006-03-06 22:24 ` Al Viro
2006-03-06 22:55 ` Greg KH
2006-03-07 10:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-07 11:08 ` Al Viro
2006-03-08 2:46 ` Rusty Russell
2006-03-07 1:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-03-07 1:57 ` Greg KH
2006-03-07 2:10 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-03-07 16:47 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-07 17:04 ` Greg KH
2006-03-07 17:06 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-08 1:03 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2006-03-08 1:33 ` Greg KH
2006-03-10 0:44 Doug Thompson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-10 16:56 Doug Thompson
2006-03-10 17:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10 17:28 Doug Thompson
2006-03-10 20:37 Doug Thompson
2006-03-11 17:04 Doug Thompson
2006-03-13 19:35 ` Dave Peterson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603072003.42327.dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--to=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dsp@llnl.gov \
--cc=dthompson@lnxi.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.