All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
To: akpm@osdl.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: olh@suse.de, neilb@suse.de, dev@openvz.org,
	bsingharora@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix shrink_dcache_parent() against shrink_dcache_memory() race (updated patch)
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:51:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060308145105.GA4243@hasse.suse.de> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1247 bytes --]

Andrew, I have test this patch for a while now and none of the users has seen
the "busy inodes" message for a while now. Can you please apply and test it in
-mm?

This is an updated version of the patch which adresses some issues that came
up during discussion. Although sb->prunes usually is 0, I'm testing it now
before calling wake_up(). Besides that, the shrink_dcache_parent() is only
waiting for prunes if we are called through generic_shutdown_super() when
sb->s_root is NULL.

Original patch description:

Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> discovered a race between shrink_dcache_parent()
and shrink_dcache_memory() which leads to "Busy inodes after unmount".
When unmounting a file system shrink_dcache_parent() is racing against a
possible shrink_dcache_memory(). This might lead to the situation that
shrink_dcache_parent() is returning too early. In this situation the
super_block is destroyed before shrink_dcache_memory() could put the inode.

This patch fixes the problem through introducing a prunes counter which is
incremented when a dentry is pruned but the corresponding inoded isn't put
yet.When the prunes counter is not null, shrink_dcache_parent() is waiting and
restarting its work.

Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>

[-- Attachment #2: umount-prune_one_dentry-fix.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3593 bytes --]

---

 fs/dcache.c        |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 fs/super.c         |    4 +++-
 include/linux/fs.h |    3 +++
 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/dcache.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
@@ -364,17 +364,22 @@ restart:
  */
 static inline void prune_one_dentry(struct dentry * dentry)
 {
+	struct super_block *sb = dentry->d_sb;
 	struct dentry * parent;
 
 	__d_drop(dentry);
 	list_del(&dentry->d_u.d_child);
 	dentry_stat.nr_dentry--;	/* For d_free, below */
+	sb->s_prunes++;
 	dentry_iput(dentry);
 	parent = dentry->d_parent;
 	d_free(dentry);
 	if (parent != dentry)
 		dput(parent);
 	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+	sb->s_prunes--;
+	if (likely(!sb->s_prunes))
+		wake_up(&sb->s_wait_prunes);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -623,19 +628,60 @@ out:
 	return found;
 }
 
+/*
+ * A special version of wait_event(!sb->s_prunes) which takes the dcache_lock
+ * when checking the condition and gives feedback if we slept.
+ */
+static int wait_on_prunes(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+	int slept = 0;
+
+#ifdef DCACHE_DEBUG
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: waiting for %d prunes\n", __FUNCTION__,
+	       sb->s_prunes);
+#endif
+
+	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+	for (;;) {
+		prepare_to_wait(&sb->s_wait_prunes, &wait,
+				TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		if (!sb->s_prunes)
+			break;
+		spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
+		schedule();
+		slept = 1;
+		spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
+	finish_wait(&sb->s_wait_prunes, &wait);
+	return slept;
+}
+
 /**
  * shrink_dcache_parent - prune dcache
  * @parent: parent of entries to prune
  *
  * Prune the dcache to remove unused children of the parent dentry.
  */
- 
+/*
+ * If we slept on waiting for other prunes to finish, there maybe are
+ * some dentries the d_lru list that we have "overlooked" the last
+ * time we called select_parent(). Therefor lets restart in this case.
+ */
 void shrink_dcache_parent(struct dentry * parent)
 {
 	int found;
+	struct super_block *sb = parent->d_sb;
 
+ again:
 	while ((found = select_parent(parent)) != 0)
 		prune_dcache(found);
+
+	/* If we are called from generic_shutdown_super() during
+	 * umount of a filesystem, we want to check for other prunes */
+	if (!sb->s_root && wait_on_prunes(sb))
+		goto again;
 }
 
 /**
Index: linux-2.6/fs/super.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/super.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/super.c
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(v
 		sema_init(&s->s_dquot.dqio_sem, 1);
 		sema_init(&s->s_dquot.dqonoff_sem, 1);
 		init_rwsem(&s->s_dquot.dqptr_sem);
+		s->s_prunes = 0;
+		init_waitqueue_head(&s->s_wait_prunes);
 		init_waitqueue_head(&s->s_wait_unfrozen);
 		s->s_maxbytes = MAX_NON_LFS;
 		s->dq_op = sb_dquot_ops;
@@ -230,8 +232,8 @@ void generic_shutdown_super(struct super
 
 	if (root) {
 		sb->s_root = NULL;
-		shrink_dcache_parent(root);
 		shrink_dcache_anon(&sb->s_anon);
+		shrink_dcache_parent(root);
 		dput(root);
 		fsync_super(sb);
 		lock_super(sb);
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/fs.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -835,6 +835,9 @@ struct super_block {
 	struct list_head	s_instances;
 	struct quota_info	s_dquot;	/* Diskquota specific options */
 
+	unsigned int		s_prunes;	/* protected by dcache_lock */
+	wait_queue_head_t	s_wait_prunes;
+
 	int			s_frozen;
 	wait_queue_head_t	s_wait_unfrozen;
 

             reply	other threads:[~2006-03-08 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-08 14:51 Jan Blunck [this message]
2006-03-09  6:33 ` [PATCH] Fix shrink_dcache_parent() against shrink_dcache_memory() race (updated patch) Balbir Singh
2006-03-09 11:00   ` Jan Blunck
2006-03-09 11:21     ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-09 11:58       ` Jan Blunck
2006-03-09 12:53       ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-03-09 14:08         ` Jan Blunck
2006-03-09 14:36           ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-03-09 11:36     ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-09 14:42 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-03-09 16:09   ` Jan Blunck
2006-03-09 16:18     ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-03-09 16:39       ` Jan Blunck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060308145105.GA4243@hasse.suse.de \
    --to=jblunck@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=olh@suse.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.