From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: leslie.polzer@gmx.net
Subject: Re: hla
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:32:59 +0100
Message-ID: <20060310203259.GA7399@wintermute>
References: <20060310201855.23619.qmail@web31913.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi"
Return-path: <linux-assembly-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060310201855.23619.qmail@web31913.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Sender: linux-assembly-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-assembly.vger.kernel.org>
To: Tim Hoolihan <thoolihan@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-assembly@vger.kernel.org


--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:18:55PM -0800, Tim Hoolihan wrote:

> I posted some info on my sight about hla, and was curious if anyone
> on here has tried it? I've used mainly gas and nasm, but this seems a
> convenient way to use them.
HLA is an educational tool used in the book "The Art Of Assembly".
  I don't think anyone uses it in serious production.
  Besides, IMHO it's quite ugly :D

    Leslie

--=20
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x52D70289
http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/

--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEEeJ6n/ep3VLXAokRAkmpAJ9JjT9rwQYl6Pm/+M/nTaDGU+byxACdEFKt
HjiWSlfwavQJ/3IqeJvSWE0=
=tgos
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--