From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FIBEw-0007Bh-OF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:03:06 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FIBEu-00079H-W6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:03:06 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FIBEu-00078z-TQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:03:04 -0500
Received: from [65.74.133.6] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FIBIV-0007dr-GW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:06:47 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu regression 0.7.2 -> 0.8.0 (ARM user emulation)
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 21:02:58 +0000
References: <5b5833aa0603011418j33a74eb4ob9bde3906cad8790@mail.gmail.com>
	<200603061503.18426.uli@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <200603061503.18426.uli@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200603112102.59861.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Monday 06 March 2006 14:03, Ulrich Hecht wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wednesday 01 March 2006 23:18, Anderson Lizardo wrote:
> > I was having some issues with the latest qemu (ARM user emulation),
> > which I tracked down to the following reduced test case:
> >
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > int main(void)
> > {
> >         float a, b;
> >         a = 0.1f;
> >         b = 0.8f;
> >         printf("a < b: %d\n", (a < b));
> >         return 0;
> > }
>
> This fails because of a bug in the glue code between NWFPE and QEMU. (It
> relies on a specific layout of the CPUARMState structure.)
>...
> +        cpsr_write(user_registers,x,~CPSR_M);

This should be CPSR_NZCV. Applied with that change.

Paul