From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1FIZ2y-000176-K6 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:28:20 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FIZ2w-00015W-RQ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:28:18 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FIZ2w-000158-Gq for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:28:18 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FIZ2w-00014p-8z for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:28:18 -0500 Received: from [212.85.152.101] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FIZ6l-00075R-T8 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:32:16 -0500 Received: from kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com (kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com [212.85.152.101]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E5A3C006287 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:28:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [??1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8173C00622C for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:28:12 +0100 (CET) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:28:18 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <44107EAC.5030300@yahoo.com> <200603112028.59600.okuji@enbug.org> <87hd64u2ul.fsf@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <87hd64u2ul.fsf@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603122228.18306.okuji@enbug.org> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.012114, version=0.17.2 Subject: Re: mkfs command in grub X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:28:19 -0000 On Saturday 11 March 2006 20:46, Marco Gerards wrote: > Heh, now I am defending a feature I don't really want, need or care > about myself. It's just that the idea is not that bad, not that I > want it or so. Interesting. :) BTW, if one really wants to implement fancy partition manipulation features, the right way would be to use libparted. This was discussed for GRUB Legacy in the past, but I don't remember the conclusion. Okuji