From: Marr <marr@flex.com>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-dev@namesys.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>,
Linda Walsh <lkml@tlinx.org>, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
marr@flex.com, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Readahead value 128K? (was Re: Drastic Slowdown of 'fseek()'
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:01:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603131501.38803.marr@flex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603131437.50461.a1426z@gawab.com>
On Monday 13 March 2006 6:37am, Al Boldi wrote:
> Marr wrote:
> > The 2.6.13 kernel on ReiserFS (without using
> > 'nolargeio=1' as a mount option) still takes about 4m35s to fseek 200,000
> > times on that 4MB file, even with 'hdparm -a0 /dev/hda' in effect.
>
> try this magic number:
>
> echo 192 > /sys/block/hda/queue/max_sectors_kb
> echo 192 > /sys/block/hda/queue/read_ahead_kb
>
> Anything outside 132-255 affects throughput negatively.
I tried this, but it seems that neither of these settings will take any value
over 128 (which is what they both started at before I tried to change them).
It seems that I can set values _lower_ than 128, but nothing higher (stock
Slackware 10.2 2.6.13 kernel).
> Also, can you dump hdparm -I /dev/hda?
Sure. Here's the results:
----------------------------------------
/dev/hda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: TOSHIBA MK2023GAS
Serial Number: 54594043T
Firmware Revision: MB001A
Standards:
Supported: 5 4 3 2
Likely used: 6
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
--
CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064
LBA user addressable sectors: 39070080
device size with M = 1024*1024: 19077 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000: 20003 MBytes (20 GB)
Capabilities:
LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
bytes avail on r/w long: 48 Queue depth: 1
Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum
R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = ?
Advanced power management level: unknown setting (0x0080)
DMA: sdma0 sdma1 sdma2 mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
Cycle time: no flow control=120ns IORDY flow control=120ns
Commands/features:
Enabled Supported:
* NOP cmd
* READ BUFFER cmd
* WRITE BUFFER cmd
* Host Protected Area feature set
* Look-ahead
* Write cache
* Power Management feature set
Security Mode feature set
SMART feature set
* Mandatory FLUSH CACHE command
* Device Configuration Overlay feature set
SET MAX security extension
* Advanced Power Management feature set
* SMART self-test
* SMART error logging
Security:
Master password revision code = 65534
supported
not enabled
not locked
frozen
not expired: security count
not supported: enhanced erase
24min for SECURITY ERASE UNIT.
HW reset results:
CBLID- above Vih
Device num = 0 determined by the jumper
Checksum: correct
----------------------------------------
I don't think anyone is implying this, but for the record, this problem is not
peculiar to this particular hard disk drive. I seem to see the problem on any
2.6.x kernel with a ReiserFS filesystem that has _not_ enabled the
(undocumented, as near as I can see) 'nolargeio=1' option on the mount.
Also, I haven't heard anything more after Hans Reiser queried Ulrich Drepper
about the 'glibc' angle on this problem, so I'm wondering if there's been any
progress on that front. Oh, I just noticed that Hans has re-pinged Ulrich on
this issue -- thanks, Hans!
Anway, as always, thanks to all who've contributed to this thread.
*** Please CC: me on replies -- I'm not subscribed.
Regards,
Bill Marr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-13 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-13 11:37 Readahead value 128K? (was Re: Drastic Slowdown of 'fseek()' Al Boldi
2006-03-13 20:01 ` Marr [this message]
2006-03-26 22:25 ` Marr
2006-03-27 18:50 ` Hans Reiser
2006-03-27 19:12 ` Marr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603131501.38803.marr@flex.com \
--to=marr@flex.com \
--cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=lkml@tlinx.org \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-dev@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.