From: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
To: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:20:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060314065022.GA5748@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <441645FB.6000002@watson.ibm.com>
> Lee's point is valid....we should be doing the set_normalized_timespec.
>
Semantically that sounds correct. But the intension of the caller as in
our case could be to convert the timespec to nsec_t. Calling
set_normalized_timespec() might be an overhead in this case.
Balbir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-14 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-14 0:40 [Patch 0/9] Per-task delay accounting Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 0:42 ` [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 1:01 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-14 1:05 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 1:12 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-14 3:42 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-14 4:26 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 6:50 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2006-03-15 10:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-15 10:28 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-14 0:45 ` Patch 2/9] Initialization Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 10:54 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-03-14 15:20 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-15 10:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-15 12:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-15 15:53 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 0:47 ` [Patch 3/9] Block I/O accounting initialization Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-15 10:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-15 16:27 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 0:48 ` [Patch 4/9] Block I/O accounting collection Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 0:51 ` [Patch 5/9] Swapin delays Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 0:53 ` [Patch 7/9] /proc interface for all I/O delays Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 0:55 ` [Patch 8/9] generic netlink utility functions Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-26 16:44 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-26 17:06 ` jamal
2006-03-14 0:56 ` [Patch 9/9] Generic netlink interface for delay accounting Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 2:29 ` jamal
2006-03-14 2:33 ` Matt Helsley
2006-03-14 2:48 ` jamal
2006-03-14 4:18 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-22 7:49 ` [RFC][UPDATED PATCH 2.6.16] " Balbir Singh
2006-03-23 14:04 ` jamal
2006-03-23 15:41 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-24 14:04 ` jamal
2006-03-24 14:54 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-25 1:19 ` jamal
2006-03-25 9:41 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-25 12:52 ` jamal
2006-03-25 15:36 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-25 17:48 ` jamal
2006-03-25 18:22 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-26 14:05 ` jamal
2006-03-26 16:40 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-24 1:32 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-24 14:11 ` jamal
2006-03-24 14:19 ` jamal
2006-03-24 14:59 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-14 4:29 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 1:01 ` [Patch 6/9] cpu delay collection Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 19:28 ` [Patch 0/9] Per-task delay accounting Greg KH
2006-03-14 20:49 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 21:24 ` Greg KH
2006-03-14 21:59 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-23 15:16 ` [Patch 0/9] Performance Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-25 2:38 ` Greg KH
2006-03-27 18:28 ` Shailabh Nagar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060314065022.GA5748@in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.