From: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: p4_clockmod broken in 2.6.16-rc? kernels
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:55:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060314095551.A4913@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060310054723.GC5600@redhat.com>; from davej@redhat.com on Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:47:23AM -0500
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:47:23AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:07:44PM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> >
> > Great to hear that the patch helped. I had a typo in the patch header
> > and attaching an updated patch.
> >
> > Dave: Please push this patch towards base. This was a bug in one of the
> > recent changes in p4-clockmod.c
>
> Applied, thanks. I fixed this one up by hand, but next time can you
> inline the patch instead of attaching it ?
Sorry for all the hassle. I wanted to send that patch out quick, before 2.6.16.
And hence ended up sending it as an attachment using the dump mail client.
> btw, should acpi-cpufreq/speedstep-ich also have those errata workarounds?
No. These two errats seem specific to clock modulation and not speedstep. So,
no changes required for speedstep.
Looking at the workarounds in p4-clockmod.c again...
Seems like some more work is needed on this. The current workaround doesn't
seem to cover all the affected steppings and also it is using int [NR_CPUS]
array to store a single bit (whether error is present or not). I will send a
follow-on cleanup patch, which I think can wait until 2.6.16.
Thanks,
Venki
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dave
>
> [1] Actually this was even longer. Due to me missing chopping a MIME
> mailheader, it still confused git-apply, and I scratched my head
> for some time until Linus clued me in. MIME- just say no!
>
> --
> http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-14 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-10 4:07 p4_clockmod broken in 2.6.16-rc? kernels Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2006-03-10 5:47 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-14 17:55 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-09 13:53 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2006-03-10 3:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-09 6:11 Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060314095551.A4913@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.