From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha <strange@nsk.no-ip.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][XM-TEST] Add mounting /sys to ramdisk
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:03:16 +0000
Message-ID: <20060314170315.GA29365@nsk.no-ip.org>
References: <1142296948.16893.46.camel@w-stekloff.beaverton.ibm.com>
	<1142305832.3172.27.camel@dyn9047022067.beaverton.ibm.com>
	<878xrdxaii.fsf@caffeine.beaverton.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <878xrdxaii.fsf@caffeine.beaverton.ibm.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:21:25AM -0800, Dan Smith wrote:
> 
> WM> Dan Is that the only check you can used is 2.6 from uname? Is
> WM> there any other piece of info you can check? <not knowing sysfs
> WM> that well>
> 
> Checking for 2.6 is a perfectly reasonable way to decide whether or
> not to mount /sys, IMHO.

And there's grep sysfs /proc/filesystems (|| modprobe -q sysfs, if
compile-as-module is ever added to sysfs).

(Sorry for replying to this post instead of the initial one, I deleted
it already.)

-- 
lfr
0/0